Behavioral Jurisprudence: Law Needs a Behavioral Revolution
There is now a large body of empirical work that calls into question the traditional legal assumptions about how law shapes behavior.
There is now a large body of empirical work that calls into question the traditional legal assumptions about how law shapes behavior.
How can we design laws in ways that don’t invite unethical behavior from ordinary people?
The current system of court summons strains everyone involved. There’s another way to approach the problem.
I was much influenced by a brilliant, pathbreaking paper, “Picking and Choosing,” by Edna Ullmann-Margalit and Sidney Morgenbesser.
Data from research I recently conducted with Bette Bottoms and Phillip Goff, published in Law and Human Behavior, suggest that the psychological experience of such police encounters is very different for Black as compared to White citizens.
Her journey into the world of confidence men and women takes the reader to the edge of reality, belief, and trust.