A Behavioral Scientist’s Guide to (Not) Betting on the 2018 World Cup
Fancy a flutter on the World Cup? Here’s the smart way to do it.
Fancy a flutter on the World Cup? Here’s the smart way to do it.
Research on the “decoy effect” reveals one way bias sneaks into hiring decisions. It also suggests a solution.
If there is one consistent yet underappreciated principle for making good hires, it’s that process beats technology.
Everyone knows that texting and driving is a terrible idea, but few understand why.
How behavioral science can help overcome suppressed altruism and unlock billions of dollars for the causes that matter most.
Blaming the oddsmakers or the odds themselves assumes that once something happens, it was bound to have happened and anyone who didn’t see it coming was wrong.
As H. L. Mencken once said, “No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”
Seconds left on the clock and a decision to make: Do you kick a field and head to overtime or risk a two-point conversion for the immediate win?
Is our reluctance to have our decisions and actions replaced by automated systems warranted?
Seemingly overnight, the University of Pennsylvania health system went from prescribing 75 percent generic medications to 98 percent. What changed?